Happy New Year, HealthNex readers. One of my resolutions is to pump up the volume on posts for this important topic. To that end, I want to call out to my IBM healthcare colleagues to step up and help feed the beast. Towit, here is a recent article from IBM's w3 intranet, on some of our efforts to catalyze change in healthcare.
Step into an emergency room in any major U.S. city and you will get a
glimpse of the bureaucracy that cripples the nation's healthcare
system. Or visit a favela in Sao Paulo and you will see that access to
basic healthcare services is virtually nonexistent.
Today’s strained, often inequitable healthcare systems threaten
economic and social instability in some parts of the world. Governments
and non-governmental organizations must confront the deficiencies in
their healthcare systems surrounding primary care, disease management
and medication costs.
IBM is a strong proponent of an integrated, public-private approach
that will render healthcare more accessible and affordable while also
making the key stakeholder — the patient — the focus of care. Already
we are partnering with local, regional, national and federal
governments to make patient-centric healthcare a reality.
Putting a broken system back together again
In the United States, IBM has been working with President Bush and
the U.S. Congress to address a fragmented healthcare system. In early
2006, IBM's Dr. Jane Barlow and Ivo Nelson testified
before two separate U.S. congressional subcommittees, calling for a new
paradigm that makes healthy outcomes the essential part of any
healthcare system.
Ned McCulloch, IBM Governmental Affairs, observes that a more functional system would
give patients and doctors a complete picture of the patient's health,
including medical history, lab results, hospitalizations and medication.
"The will to create this patient-centric healthcare model is
fundamental," says McCulloch, "but equally important is creating
interoperable IT infrastructures that connect hospitals, agencies,
research institutions — just about everyone who has a hand in shaping
healthcare for individuals and populations."
In lobbying for a transformation of the current U.S. healthcare
system, McCulloch and IBM colleagues, such as Dr. Martin Sepulveda,
vice president, Global Well-being Services & Health Benefits, begin
their advocacy work by focusing on a problem that inhibits the
development of a truly patient-centered model. One of IBM's
recommendations is to create a reimbursement structure that primarily
rewards providers for increasing patient health — instead of rewarding
providers for seeing as many patients as possible, as is the case today.
"In the current Medicare statute, for example," says McCulloch, "the
Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services do not reward healthcare
providers for sharing information that, say, would reduce medication
errors. At IBM we're working to craft a solution that would reimburse
providers for doing that."
Does anyone have any clout?
No one understands the shortcomings of the current U.S. healthcare
system better than employers, who have collected metrics on quality
from their insurers and providers. Working with IBM and other large
employers, government agencies are now looking at the role that IT can
play in reducing medical errors, integrating lab results, x-rays and
medical history and encouraging patients themselves to take more
responsibility for their wellness.
The impact that employers in Germany and France, for example, can
have on reimbursement structures can be even more profound, especially
as those governments pay for a significant portion of their citizens'
healthcare. In China and India, where the individual shoulders more of
the financial burden for healthcare than in the United States or
Europe, the role that employers can play in reforming reimbursement
structures becomes even more critical.
Johan Hjertqvist, president of Stockholm and Brussels-based Health
Consumer Powerhouse, observed recently in The Wall Street Journal that
two out of three European Union countries delay the introduction of new
medicines into the reimbursement system. An integrated healthcare
system could expedite access to these medicines — and ultimately
facilitate more healthy outcomes.
Change or stay the same?
Governments are potentially the most influential agents of change
and paradoxically the most stubborn in their commitment to healthcare
systems they have created or inherited. Will they overcome their
reluctance to legislate the changes necessary to implement an
interoperable, standards-based healthcare system?
IBM is working with governments around the globe to help ask the questions — and shape the answers.
Healthcare legislation in the U.S. Congress
S.1418: Wired for Health Care Quality Act
Currently in conference with the U.S. House of Representatives,
S.1418 would create grant authority for health information technology
projects. It would require that federal agencies accept medical reports
submitted via standardized electronic systems. This legislation
received Senate approval on November 18, 2005.
HR.4859: Federal Family Health Information Technology Act of 2006
The bill would provide for the implementation of an electronic
health records system under the Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program. This legislation received approval from the U.S. House of
Representatives on September 14, 2006.
Recent Comments